Supreme Court Rulings
SC directs that SLP filed by Pernod Ricard India Pvt. Ltd. (Assessee) against Bombay HC judgment upholding Revenue's power to demand 100% bank guarantee in the alleged undervaluation dispute involving
...View More SC dismisses the civil appeal filed by Revenue against the CESTAT (Mumbai)’s ruling, which held that cartridges for I-STAT Analyzer Immuno along with the accessories and cartridges are classifia
...View More SC dismisses Revenue’s SLP against Karnataka High Court's decision which held in favour of Pioneer Trading and PepsiCo regarding VAT exemption on sales of 'White Oats' for AYs 2007-08 to 2009-10
...View More SC upholds Karnataka High Court (Dharwad Bench) judgment that, in absence of records, medicines samples cleared for both in-house testing and for testing through outside laboratories will have to be c
...View More SC dismisses BSNL's appeal, holding that the classification of steel tubular transmission poles (Hamilton poles/tubes) manufactured by BSNL under Heading 7306.90 (tubes and pipes) for the purpose of c
...View More SC allows Revenue's appeals, quashes CESTAT Mumbai ruling, and restores service tax demand on BPCL and HPCL(Assessees), holding that activities undertaken in relation to sale of Compressed Natural Gas
...View More SC dismisses the civil appeal filed by Revenue, challenging the CESTAT (Mumbai)’s ruling, whereby it set aside the confiscation and penalty order passed by the Commissioner of Customs; On the ba
...View More In a significant matter concerning State’s power to redraw boundaries of tax exemption on a commodity, SC affirms the State’s competence to retrospectively amend Entry 31-B of the Fifth Sc
...View More SC upholds the constitutional validity of the Explanation to Rule 38 of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy Minerals) Concession Rules, 2016 and the identical Explanation to Rule
...View More SC issues notice in SLP filed by Vedanta Limited/Assessee against the Madras High Court’s judgment, which set aside the CESTAT Chennai order which held that the bar of unjust enrichment was not
...View More
 (1).PNG)
