High Court Rulings


Shifting includes 'relocation', allows Rule 10 'credit transfer' on moving factory to another site

HC dismisses Revenue's appeal, transfer of un-utilised CENVAT credit under Rule 10 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR) available where assessee shifts his factory from one site to another; Rejecting Re...View More

Upholds CST reimbursement on inter-state EOU purchases; DGFT cannot alter FTP framework 

HC dismisses Revenue’s writ appeals, affirms reimbursement of CST to EOU-assessee in respect of purchases made from other EOU in terms of Para 6 of FTP 2009-14; Upholds order of Single Judge Ben...View More

Notification stipulating concessional duty for 'taxis' a complete code; Section 11B refund limitation inapplicable 

HC ​rejects CESTAT findings, ​holds that ​Notification No. 3/2001-CE issued u/s 5A of Central Excise Act prescribing concessional rate of duty on cars registered as 'taxis' is a special provisio...View More

Dismisses assessee's writ petition sans any fault in authorities' decision making process

HC dismisses challenge to orders passed by Appellate Authority and CESTAT finding no irregularity in decision making process followed by the authorities; Assessee submitted that, order in original was...View More

'Mandatory pre-deposit' u/s 129E curtails undue litigation, doesn't render right to appeal "illusory" 

HC dismisses challenge to constitutional validity of Section 129E of Customs Act, holds that mandate of pre-deposit of 7.5% / 10% of duty and / or penalty demanded is reasonable, not rendering the rig...View More

Allows extension after warehousing period expiration; No interest on EPCG license clearances

HC dismisses Revenue’s appeal, no impediment in extending warehousing period absent any bar u/s 61 of Customs Act despite expiry of initial 1 year period; Referring to Bombay HC ratio in Sunil J...View More

Mere omission to disclose scrap & waste clearance in returns not 'wilful suppression'

HC holds that mere failure to declare / disclose clearance of waste and scrap in Returns does not amount to ‘suppression’ absent “intention to evade payment of excise duty” so ...View More

Upholds confiscation & penalty for non-compliance of post import conditions despite Notification rescission

HC upholds confiscation and imposition of penalty in respect of imported CT scanner, accessories and spare parts since assessee, a diagnostic centre, did not accord such facilities to p...View More

Credit-note pursuant to assessment finalisation doesn't absolve 'unjust enrichment' test for refund 

HC sets aside CESTAT order sanctioning refund of excise duty assuming that burden thereof had not been passed on to customers in view of credit notes issued pursuant to finalization of assessment; Rel...View More

DGFT Notification not mere 'executive instruction'; Import permit mandatory despite non-insecticidal use

HC upholds requirement of furnishing permit from Central Insecticide Board Registration Committee for import of ‘Bronopol’ as mandated by DGFT Notification No. 106 (RE-13)/2009-14, despite...View More