High Court Rulings
Delhi HC directs of refund of the entire proceeds arising out of disposed gold jewellery detained from Thai national (Petitioner) with 6% interest, considering that the detained jewellery which was pe
...View More Calcutta HC upholds the dismissal of appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (appeals), Kolkata for non-compliance of section 129E mandate requiring deposit of certain percentage of duty/penalty demande
...View More Delhi HC holds that “there is no specific period of limitation prescribed for proceeding against availing of excess duty drawback” and the absence of any limitation in Rule 16 of the Drawb
...View More Delhi HC reiterates that unlocking of mobile phones, when exporting mobile phones, would not result in withdrawal of duty drawback benefits, referring to AIMS Retail Services and IConnect India judgme
...View More Madras HC allows writ petition challenging show cause notice, issued after 17 years, seeking submissions of export obligation discharge certificate (EODC) proving completion of exports against Advance
...View More Bombay HC directs reward to Petitioner for valuable intelligence provided to Sales Tax Department from 1992 onwards, based upon which, the sale tax recoveries were made from the tax evaders; Remarks &
...View More Bombay HC dismisses writ petitions filed by importers contesting SCNs issued u/s 28 of the Customs Act, that proposes to recover the preferential tariff benefits claimed on imports of tin ingots under
...View More Chhattisgarh HC allows Assessee’s appeal recognizing its right to cross-examine its manager whose statement was recorded during the adjudication proceedings based on which demand was confirmed;
...View More Madras HC upholds CESTAT Delhi ruling that dismissed the appeal of an Indonesian company manufacturing ‘Viscose Staple Fibre’ against the final findings of Designated Authority (DA) recomm
...View More Karnataka HC directs the Assessee to deposit 50% of the demand out of the demand of Rs 644 Crores (approx.) for the period July 2008 to March 2014 which was not pursued by the Karnataka Commercial Tax
...View More
 (1).PNG)
