High Court Rulings
Allahabad HC holds assessee eligible for rebate in terms of Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 r/w Notification No.19/2004 dated September 6, 2004 on removal of LCD panels and parts of coloured tel
...View More Bombay HC clarifies that the assessee opting for Amnesty Scheme would not have any impact on the disbursement to be made by the State of the tax recovered from the selling dealer which was disallowed
...View More Delhi HC sets aside Notification dated June 18, 2018 issued by the Commissioner (VAT) under Rule 8(10) of CST Delhi Rules cancelling the used F-Forms as obsolete/invalid; Relies upon own ruling in cas
...View More Delhi HC holds the assessee-lessor eligible for duty drawback as per Section 74 of Customs Act, where aircraft leased to Kingfisher Airlines (lessee) was detained by customs authorities and assessee s
...View More Delhi HC allows Revenues’ writ petition challenging decision of Settlement Commission upon an application filed by assessee in respect of smuggled goods being 'gold'; Notes Revenue’s plea
...View More Rajasthan HC dismisses assessee’s writ challenging action of Assessing Authority in initiating proceedings u/s 25 of Rajasthan VAT Act and passing of ‘assessment order' as being time barre
...View More Rajasthan HC allows Revenue's appeal, quashes CESTAT’s finding that goods had to be released in the circumstance where no notice was issued before extension of time (for issuing SCN) under provi
...View More Bombay HC grants time to Maharashtra State Government to form its view on Petitioner's contention as to State's commitment of waiver of Luxury Tax which cannot be given effect to, due to introduction
...View More Madras HC dismisses assessee’s writ challenging show cause notice issued u/s 11A of Central Excise Act, 1944 (Act) seeking to recover 'rebate' alleged to be erroneously sanctioned on the premise
...View More HC upholds CESTAT’s order confirming demand of interest in terms of Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR) along with penalty under Rule 15 where assessee failed to reverse CENVAT credit tak
...View More
 (1).PNG)
