CESTAT Rulings
CESTAT Ahmedabad allows Assessee’s appeal, holds that ‘Kopiko (cappuccino and espresso varieties)' containing more than 74% sugar and glucose. is classifiable under heading 1704 which incl
...View More
CESTAT Mumbai sets aside Order denying CENVAT Credit on Hospitality and Air Travel Services, holds that the same rightly fall under the definition of input service and thus eligible to credit both
...View More CESTAT Allahabad sets aside order classifying the services being a part of indivisible contract under the taxable category ‘Design Services’ and confirming demand of service tax on reverse
...View More CESTAT Allahabad holds that services of ‘Search Engine Optimization’, ‘Google Ads/Pay Per Click’, ‘Mobile application development’ and 'Web development' cannot be c
...View More CESTAT Allahabad rejects refund claim of Service Tax paid on education services related to admission of students in Chinese professional colleges, ruling that, they are not ‘auxiliary educa
...View More CESTAT Kolkata rules out taxability under 'supply of tangible goods' (SOTG) service on amounts received as rebate towards supply of rakes/wagons to clients; Under the Wagon Investment Scheme,(WIS
...View More CESTAT Ahmedabad rules that advertising expenses reimbursed to the Assessee is ultimately borne by the franchisee because the same is part of its business expenses which cannot be included i
...View More CESTAT Ahmedabad quashes orders confirming interest demand, confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine and penalty on goods imported in violation of pre-import condition citing absence of an
...View More CESTAT Delhi quashes the demand, alongwith penalty u/s 28(4) of the Customs Act, 1962 against Benetton India (assessee) for simply making an error in classifying ‘Knitted Jackets&rsqu
...View More CESTAT Mumbai holds that ‘36-Port-100GE Interface Card’ imported by Huawei Telecommunication was correctly classified under the Bill of Entry under CTH 8517 7010 as Populated Printed Circu
...View More
 (1).PNG)
