CESTAT Rulings
CESTAT Ahmedabad sets aside service tax demand of around Rs.16.32 lakh holding that Revenue’s reliance solely on Form 26AS (TDS Statement) of Assessee to establish undervaluation is unjustified
...View More CESTAT Allahabad condemns assessee’s practice for seeking adjournments in the matter beyond three times; Dismissing appeal for non-prosecution, holds in view of section 35C(1A) of the Central Ex
...View More CESTAT Delhi sets aside order which held that ‘digital still image video cameras’ imported by Sony India (assessee) would not be entitled to basic customs duty exemption Notification No.25
...View More CESTAT Ahmedabad dismisses Revenue's appeals and upholds refund of Rs 20.46 crores (approx.) granted to Rajpath Club Ltd.(Assessee) for service tax paid on "club or association services" for
...View More CESTAT Ahmedabad allows appeal of Reliance Industries Ltd (Assessee) and quashes the demand of customs duty, interest, and penalty for import of A-180 grade Naphtha imported under Advance Authorizatio
...View More CESTAT New Delhi allows the appeal of CG Power & Industrial Solution Ltd. (formerly Crompton Greaves Ltd.) by setting aside service tax demand on technical know-how received from foreign JV partne
...View More CESTAT Delhi partially allows appeal by GAIL Training Institute (assessee) against denial of CENVAT credit, holding that credit for training of GAIL employees by external institutes is inadmissible as
...View More CESTAT Delhi sets aside the FOB value re-determination by the Addl. Commr., holds “Customs Act and Rules cannot be applied to re-determine the FOB value”; Asserts that Customs officer, bei
...View More CESTAT Mumbai sets aside order confirming recovery of accumulated CENVAT credit under rule 14 of CCR, 2004 on Future Generali India Life Insurance (assessee) to the extent attributable to insurance se
...View More CESTAT Delhi holds that works contract for road construction within residential complex/commercial premises is not exempted from service tax exemption under Notification No. 25/2012; Considering that
...View More
 (1).PNG)
