CESTAT Rulings


Allows refund of CVD/SAD paid under GST-regime to regularise excess import under AA 

CESTAT Chennai allows refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid during GST regime for import made pre June 2017 under advance authorization scheme (AA); To regularise ...View More

Revenue cannot recover penalty & interest by appropriation from sanctioned rebate during appeal pendency 

CESTAT Ahmedabad sets-aside appropriation of sanctioned rebate towards recovery of penalty and interest corresponding to a confirmed demand during the period when the demand was impugned before the Tr...View More

TCS collected from scrap buyer not additional consideration, excludible from assessable value

CESTAT Ahmedabad rules that TCS amount is not an additional consideration flowing from the buyer to the seller (assessee-manufacturer) as per 6 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 but the same is ...View More

Limitation inapplicable to refund arising due to retrospective exemption given to specified services

CESTAT Delhi rules out applicability of limitation for claiming refund of amount where service-tax was not payable in view of retrospective exemption given to specified services vide an amending notif...View More

No requirement for SEZ to be ‘separate legal entity’; Refund allowable as ‘distinct identity’

CESTAT Ahmedabad allows refund claim of assessee operating both as Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) Unit, with distinct operations having separate books of account; Refe...View More

Credit availment basis invoice photocopies a mere procedural lapse, cannot be basis for denial

CESTAT Ahmedabad rules that CENVAT credit availed on the strength of Xerox copies of purchase invoices (instead of original copies) cannot be denied;  Noting that, there is no dispute regarding t...View More

Upholds penalty on assessee actively involved in facilitating passing of fraudulent CENVAT credit 

CESTAT Ahmedabad upholds imposition of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 noticing that assessee was actively involved in facilitating to pass on the wrong CENVAT credit by issuing invoices...View More

Mere short payment of duty not sufficient to invoke extended period of limitation

CESTAT Mumbai rules that mere short payment of duty by the assessee is not sufficient to invoke the extended period of limitation, more so when assessee has been periodically filing ER-1 returns etc. ...View More

Quashes confiscation where assessee suo-moto sought rectification for genuine 'clerical mistake' in BoE

CESTAT Delhi condones clerical mistake made during filing of Bill of entries (BoE) by mentioning ‘Apatite (GR) Calcium Phosphate’ in place of ‘Calcium phosphate’ where assessee...View More

Refund cannot be denied presuming ab-initio ineligibility & procedure cannot substitute recovery 

CESTAT, Mumbai holds that "denial of refund on the presumption of ab initio ineligibility will not stand and refund procedure cannot be claimed to be a substitute for recovery" and "is without authori...View More